Message: A Father’s Heart

Steve — Sun, 20 Jun 2010 14:30:27 +0000

Here are the supporting Scriptures from the message on ‘A Father’s Heart’, June 20, 2010. The audio message will be posted here: A Father’s Heart

… and the slides are here:

Further readings on ‘A Father’s Heart’:

Want to know what your teenage kids are up against? This is an eye-opener:

… and here’s another …

Tags: children, Christian, Church, Family, God, leadership, Life, Sermon notes, Youth

Christianity-A Pop History of the Last 150 Years

Steve — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 17:26:13 +0000

Start the picture around the 1850s, at a time when almost everyone was still on board with a single sense of morality as defined by the Church & the Bible. Everybody believed a thing is either true on false – there was only absolute truth. It is a high standard to follow, and some fail. Many are already outside the church – alcoholics, prostitutes, the desperately poor, the willfully lost … which is odd, because they’re the very people Christ said he came to save, and with whom he frequently connected. Few Christians chose to notice this, however, and fewer did anything about it.
Across the next 100 years, with the increase in mobility of the industrial revolution (the rise of the railroads, seeking jobs in the cities, emigrating to another country, new wealth and, later, automobiles), community cohesion begins to erode. People aren’t perpetually connected with their family and old friends, so they don’t have to live up to those expectations.
Suburbs grow up; houses are farther apart and driving for everyday needs (school, groceries, church) becomes the norm. At the same time, the communication of ideas increases – reading rates increase as school is mandated for all children; college is something to aspire to; newspapers are more readily available and more widely read. Every town and village has a library. Later, telephone and radio improve the dissemination of new ideas (and later still, movies and then television).
With the advent of those schools, teenagers become a group unto themselves, rather than each child being part of a family. They discover common ground – how parents can say one thing and do another; humor is peer-based rather than family-based, so clowning and pranks abound. Boy-girl relationships become more accessible now that continual family monitoring is absent. Parents begin to feel the frustration of loss of control over their children and point to the school as the reason. Meanwhile teenage ‘rebellion’ becomes a standard, as teens naturally try to distance themselves from their parents’ beliefs and ideals.
Some people don’t want to be held to an absolute standard of morality and they break away from the church. Having left their family (or secure in the knowledge that they can leave their family whenever they want to) their burden of conformity is eased. They break away from this standard and from the church -
1. perhaps because they have sinned in some way that they want to condone or excuse,
2. or perhaps because they want to justify a future or potential form of conduct.
Those people originally leaving the church are seen first as shocking and brazen, then as courageous and daring, since they’re risking public condemnation. Because they are so radically different, they attain near-hero status. They are seen as ‘their own person’; holding to the courage of their convictions. Recall that they are not alone – others were already ignored by the church, and consequently outcast. The two groups may connect to some degree. The temporary angst and rebellions of teens adds to the numbers and confusion.
As time goes by, others also break away – either (1) through discussion with/ persuasion from these ‘early adopters’, (2) on their own, or (3) (possibly the largest group, and definitely including the teens at the point) because it’s ‘cool’ to rebel. New moral philosophies are developed.
1. Truth is no longer seen universally as absolute;
2. God is redefined to fit a mold: “God is love” is kept; “God is Holy” slips.
As more people leave the church for this new morality:
1. many concerned and liberal preachers attempt to soften the perceived harshness of the church’s message and dilute it. The congregation is told the same message, “God is Love”, and the Righteousness of God is put aside. The logic is to get the people back into church where they can be reached with a ‘truer’ gospel once they’re back. Social awareness is acceptable to all, and so that becomes the extent of any effort to help others.
2. At the same time, many fundamentalist preachers react by drawing a hard line, condemning the leavers – circling the wagons to protect against possible incursion of external beliefs.
Some of the pillars of the church – people who were leaders and very public about it – inevitably slip. Priests; pastors; televangelists. Still very public, everybody sees the failures and shame being revealed.
There are other people who slip first and then become leaders in the church after punishment – Chuck Colson and others. This is seen – at least initially – as a way to get back into peoples’ good graces. It’s convenient to be redeemed in jail – easier to get out earlier for good behavior.
Either way, the church is seen as harboring hypocrisy. When it attempts to speak out against the new morality, the hypocritical divide is brought up.
Many in the church itself see the hypocrisy more clearly than the Message and leave, disenchanted.
Now when the church tries to uphold Biblical principles and speaks of absolute truth, it is seen as outmoded, irrelevant and, of course, hypocritical. People have moved on – so should the church.
By now, abortion, homosexuality and same-sex marriage are all becoming acceptable to society, although not to those of the church hierarchy that see the Bible as inerrant.
Church and state begin a rapid separation.
For a while, many Christians hold on desperately to the illusion that the state owes allegiance to the church, and connect to form political alliances and voting blocs. Politicians pay attention to such blocs, and so pay lip service to Christianity.
At the same time however, laws are passed to enforce the separation. Political allegiance cannot be encouraged from the pulpit or the church’s tax status is revoked. Later, laws are passed to revoke tax status if the church insists on applying a morality that differs from the state’s moral code – for instance, if it won’t condone and perform same-sex marriages.
Slowly the church comes to realize that its mission is in jeopardy unless it gets back to its roots. No longer enjoying a most-favored status as it has since 313AD, the church is under a form of persecution – mild, compared to the 2 centuries before Constantine, but increasingly evident.
With the decreasing acceptability of church, many people who used to go now disconnect from the church. The number of people calling themselves Christians drops precipitously – 80% or more no longer claim allegiance to the church. The miniscule congregations that remain can no longer support the buildings they met in, and so sell them off.
Denominations that own such buildings become very wealthy from the sales (temporarily); they focus on the larger pockets of Christians in the cities. For a while the remaining churches thrive – they have the best leaders, speakers and visionaries in the denomination, as well as the lion’s share of the budget, allowing them the best technology for communication.
In other areas, those Christians who still hold onto their belief consolidate into those churches that have managed to hold on; they begin to ignore their denominational boundaries and focus on core principles.
In still other areas, Christians meet in homes in small groups.
Tax-exempt status for churches is reduced, although for other religions is continued.
The Church begins to reemerge as missional. People who become Christians do so at the risk that they may experience some persecution – at work, from their neighbors and even from their family. Being a Christian becomes either something to be denied or embraced passionately. People who go to church commit everything to Christ and depend on Him completely.
Christians have become the outsiders and the risk-takers. Some see them as impractical, self-destructive and stubborn fools; others see them as courageous and daring, since they’re risking public condemnation. Because they are so radically different, they attain near-hero status. They are seen as ‘their own person’; holding to the courage of their convictions.
People who aren’t Christian start to ask a question that hasn’t been asked since 313AD: “If being a Christian leads to persecution, why would anyone become one? What is there in it that is worth that danger?” The question puzzles people. They ask a Christian, who starts to tell them about what Jesus Christ means to him.

Tags: children, Church, Family, ideas, mission, Sin

High School Yearbooks

Steve — Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:50:15 +0000

Amazingly, from 1950 until 2000, no fewer than 11 members of my family were graduated from high school! Looking at their yearbook photographs, one can’t but be struck at the changes that stay the same (mouseover for the graduating year):

It’s an incredible likeness – unbelievable even … or it would be if it weren’t for this site: YearbookYourself.com

Which of the family is the best looking, would you say?

Tags: Family, photo

I've Been Thinking About This... » Family

Message: A Father’s Heart

Christianity-A Pop History of the Last 150 Years

High School Yearbooks