I've Been Thinking About This…

Just been thinking about the verse of the day – you can see it by twittering “@votd votd” – Psa 46:1 God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble. (ESV)

Getting into mischief

- and thinking about how often I am my own trouble. I’m an expert at causing all sorts of issues for myself, mostly because I ignore what is right in my quest for almost anything else. And yet, at the end of the day, when I realize how I’ve messed up yet again; when I’ve managed to prove to myself yet again that I can rocket off the straight and narrow path at a moment’s notice; when I recognize that I’m drowning – I am deeply grateful there is help at hand.

The danger, of course, is that we can take this help for granted. How are YOU doing?

Send article as PDF to

My Twitterbot – @votd – sent this verse out today -

Psa 50:15 – And call upon me in the day of trouble: I will deliver thee, and thou shalt glorify me. (KJV< -votd) #votd

- and when I saw it it gave me a bit of a nudge. The reason I endure certain problems is so that I am forced to call upon the Lord for help. Backed into a corner, I can’t solve the problem myself, so I pray upwards.

This Scripture passage is saying that we will be delivered from those problems specifically so that we can glorify God. A neat reminder.

Send article as PDF to

Reading Mark chapter 5 brings you to this passage:

And the person I’m feeling for is Jairus. There’s obviously a terrible urgency – Jairus (a synagogue president!) is on his knees begging in front of this Jesus; he says that his daughter is at the point of death. You can feel the relief in his mind as he’s finally got the Great Healer in tow to bring Jesus home to heal his 12-year-old daughter. Then some silly woman has to go and get herself healed in the middle of all this! AND she’s ritually unclean … AND she shouldn’t be in this crowd … AND she shouldn’t be touching anyone, let alone someone as holy as this Man. And as if that wasn’t enough, Jesus has to stop and have a little chat with her – “OK, OK, she’s healed, for heaven’s sake. Let’s just get going here!”

Then come the messengers. Jairus recognizes them and must have guessed as soon as he saw them what the story was – his daughter was gone. I cannot imagine the grief he must have felt; the anger at that wretched woman for holding up the journey. Life suddenly grows awfully dark for Jairus.

But God has a plan. (No duh! He always has a plan.) And Jesus overhears the bad news (v. 36) and a chink of light burns into the blackness – the Great Healer seems to think there’s still hope. Now in an act of grace, Jesus permits only the four men to continue with Him – Peter, James and John (the inner circle) and Jairus – to Jairus’ house. Somehow the entire crowd was dissipated, and there was sudden quiet.

I wonder what Jesus said to Jairus during that walk? Was there silence? Deep words? We’ll never know. But the light of hope must have grown a little brighter for Jairus, don’t you think?

When they got to the house the mourning was in full force; surely he must have felt sick with grief. If everybody was mourning, all hope had to be gone. Yet Jesus continues, and ejecting all the mourners, goes over to her bed. Three disciples, two parents and one Lord. Still there is a crack of light for Jairus – the Healer has now seen her and hasn’t stopped.

And He doesn’t seem to do anything special. He simply takes her hand and says, “Up you get.” And she did! Poor old Jairus! How could he handle the shattering of all that darkness? Light detonated around him – life would never be the same. All his preconceived notions of how the world worked were blown away. I’m guessing that, although his daughter got up and began walking, Jairus needed to have a bit of a lie-down!

I find it so easy to see the darkness moving in, just like I imagine Jairus did. The busyness, the inclinations and the beliefs of the world – like Jairus’ crowd, woman and mourners – all get in the way of the light for me too. Sometimes I’m holding on to the sure Truth of the Gospel for myself (by my fingernails, it seems) because there are times in my life when problems are presented to me, I think, solely in order to show me that God is active.

Send article as PDF to

My pastor has started to read through the Gospel of Mark for the rest of the month – you can follow him here: Saving Pastor Ryan. So a few of our small group members are joining him – thought I would too, even though I’m a few days behind here. As others join the blogfest, I’ll post their links.

Of all the things I think of when I read chapter 1 of Mark’s Gospel, I think that the idea of timing hits me most solidly.

First the promise of 2,000 years has suddenly come to pass, and who was ready for it? As a nation it had looked forward to this time since its infancy in Goshen, Egypt – as the patriarchs did before that – but it has been so long that expectancy had become the habit and realization just couldn’t take hold.

Then comes John the Baptist to ‘Prepare the way of the Lord’ – but very few are awake to hear his song in the Jordan Valley. He must have had some impact though: God never sends someone to do pointless things.

But most of all, he is there for the Christ – to make sure that the prophecies are completed:

• Mark 1:4 “John appeared…” (to fulfill Malachi 3:1 and Isaiah 40:3-4)
• Mark 1:9 “In those days Jesus came from Nazareth of Galilee” (a prophecy referenced in Matt 2:23 that seems to refer back to something Isaiah references in Isaiah 11:1)
• Mark 1:15 “and saying, ‘The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand; repent and believe in the gospel.’

Secondly I’m struck by the immediacy of response throughout the chapter. Look at all these verses:

For all that few are awake to respond to the Christ, He Himself is in the center of a whirlpool of activity. Every few minutes some new event seems to be triggered; there is a sense of intense and irresistible urgency; once the Christ has appeared, there is no stopping the forward momentum.

Send article as PDF to

Have you noticed that there are many times when we don’t want to do something, but we want to want to do it? That sure is true for me. Paul says it in Galatians:

… and more clearly in Romans chapter 7, in each of these verses:

There are times we don’t want to do something, even though we know it’s the right thing to do – but we know we should want to do it.

We don’t do it because we don’t want to do it. But we wish we wanted to do it.

Similarly, each of the ‘works of the flesh’ as Paul calls them (as opposed to the fruits of the Spirit) has this characteristic: we want to do those for which we have a weakness, but we don’t want to want to. How many times have we caught ourselves in a rage about something, for instance, only to realize that (a) it felt so good and (b) it was so wrong? ¹

I think we’re designed that way, and I think it was done for a very specific reason. Over and over again, I find that God limits Himself and us. He could have made us perfect, but for our benefit He didn’t.

So where does all this leave us? Are we helpless pawns to our desires and weaknesses? I don’t think so – for these reasons:

1. As Christians, we are children of Almighty God. Good Dads don’t leave their children defenseless. We are tempted, and it seems that the temptation is permitted in order to produce endurance:
   No temptation has overtaken you that is not common to man. God is faithful, and He will not let you be tempted beyond your ability, but with the temptation He will also provide the way of escape, that you may be able to endure it.– 1 Cor 10:13
2. We are called to ACT, not to REACT. When we act, the things we do and the thoughts we think originate new sequences of events. He who starts something controls it first – the other side must work within the scope of the original action. The enemy longs to reverse that, in order to keep us off balance. But if we get into the habit of ‘checking in’ with the Father before everything we do, then everything we do becomes an initial action, and it is as if every prior wrong step is redeemed thereby. Bad steps are stopped. Poor choices are corrected. Good decisions are strengthened. And best of all, that habit will spill over into the rest of our lives. Thus every thought will be checked out first with God as well – held hostage to the Lord:
   We destroy arguments and every lofty opinion raised against the knowledge of God, and take every thought captive to obey Christ, …– 2 Cor 10:5

As the leading proponent of Galatians 5:19-21 thinking, I can attest to the fact that – on the rare occasion when I remember to – when I tell God that I want to think these thoughts but I don’t want to want to, I find it’s easier to shift my mind onto some more healthy topic. Similarly when I don’t want to apologize to someone who deserves an apology, etc..

Life isn’t easy, but then – it was never intended to be.

Send article as PDF to

I’ve been thinking about churches recently – reading a lot about church leadership, following some of the great leaders’ blogs and twitters, thinking about how churches start and about how they come to an end. I suppose there are some that shut down by being called to do so, just as they started up. But I can’t think of any offhand, and most die a long, painful, lingering death.

There are so many reasons for a church’s death – occasionally, people in a rural setting simply aren’t there anymore when the whole town shuts down; in an urban setting, sometimes the neighborhood becomes commercial or industrial and houses are pulled down and replaced with a mall or a factory. But mostly, I suspect, the church simply fails to listen, obey and fulfill its mission – to go into the world and make disciples. When it doesn’t do that, it lets Christ down; He pulls the plug.

A couple of days ago, I was thinking about the parable of the talents ¹. We always think of it being applied to individuals, but I started wondering if it could be applied to a church. Do churches fit into this pattern? I think so.

Here’s the précis: Some fit the 1-talent mold: they’re holding a great gift, but they’re clueless about what to do with it. They don’t want to risk losing what they have, so they bury the chance for success. Some fit the 2-talent mold: they take the risk and they find expansion happens, even though their situation isn’t ideal – they used what they were given to great effect. Then there are some that are 5-talent churches: they’re in an ideal position – they have the geography and the population, the leadership is just right and they act on it. They experience tremendous growth – in evangelism, in discipleship, in missions, in spiritual vitality.

Let me flesh that out after the Scripture:

There are churches that have been ‘doing church’ for so long it has become a habit, rather than a mission. New people aren’t searched for, or even delighted in when they arrive – they’re tolerated, and that only if they stay inside the boundaries that the church currently maintains. But the most terrifying thing of all is change. For these institutions, any change at all is anathema – someone in the congregation will object: “It’s not the way we do things here!” – so if change is suggested by anyone foolish enough to risk it, the suggestion is quickly squashed. Things that annoy people may cause them to leave, and 1-talent churches are too small and frail to be able to afford someone leaving. However, people must leave in the end, and as the oldest of the congregation are carried out, the congregation dwindles slowly into dust…and their talent is taken from them – they buried it, quite literally, in their coffins.

Then there are the 2-talent churches that really ‘get’ their mission, but may be positioned away from the big population centers and so don’t get the huge numbers of people that the mega-churches do. But they get to work anyway, and they apply creativity to their situation where they are; they embrace change as not just inevitable but also useful. They listen to the Word and the Spirit; they do some things with future growth in mind; they steal ideas and look at how ‘big’ churches model innovation – and they connect to the culture around themselves and in so doing reach others…and their 2 talents become 4.

Finally there are the 5-talent churches. Mega-churches have gotten a bad rap these days, but I have to wonder how much of this is fueled by jealousy or belief that it happened by some sleight-of-hand. Ministry shouldn’t be a competition; it should be a partnership. This is a race we’re all in, not as competitors but as a relay team. God forbid we should decide that other churches are ‘the enemy’ – hasn’t Satan won then? Isn’t that exactly what he wants? Get us to fighting against each other and we won’t have time to bring people to Christ.

The 5-talent church has the highest strengths, but also the greatest responsibilities. So many of these churches are in high-population areas, and for them, the following holds true:

• Big business thrives in the big cities; big business seeks out and draws in high-performers and makes them live in proximity.
• High performers (Christian or not) want to excel – at maximizing income, fame, influence or anything else they see as their target. So they move to the cities.
• Some high-performers are great leaders; all great leaders are high-performers. The city holds many great leaders.
• Some great leaders are Christians, go to church, and become involved in their church’s missions.
• A church, like every other endeavor, grows fastest under great leadership.
• A church can only grow when it reaches out.
• Churches can grow fastest and largest where there is the highest population to reach out to – in the cities.
• Cities hold the densest population of broken people – some on the streets, some going there, some lost in other ways.
• Christ seeks to heal, to comfort, to meet needs and to draw others to Himself.
• Christ uses the church to do this.
• The Spirit will guide the obedient church into developing ministries to fulfill Christ’s desire.
• Big lostness requires a big response, which in turn requires big resources. The Spirit (an infinite resource Himself!) can marshal those resources through organizations willing to obey sacrificially.

Christ has always put a premium on healing the lost and broken – unfortunately His church has often felt they were a nuisance. 2-talent churches – and 5-talent churches even more – must and do put themselves in the role of the Samaritan rather than the priest or the Levite².

The only real difference in our parable between the servant who got 2 talents and the one that was given 5 talents is that their master favored the latter – presumably because he recognized higher potential – there was something greater that the 5-talent servant was capable of. The only difference between a 2-talent church and a 5-talent church is that the 5-talent church has similarly been granted access to greater resources – planted in a city, perhaps, rather than a rural area. There is no difference in the effort each put in – both doubled the original talents entrusted to them.

And the reward for each was identical. The master said, “Well done, good and faithful servant. You have been faithful over a little; I will set you over much. Enter into the joy of your master.”

We may not be called to be a 5-talent church – but that better not stop us from being a 2-talent church. When the Master in question is God, entering into His joy is beyond understanding!

Send article as PDF to