Is God Dismantling Denominations?
I’m becoming convinced that God has started to dismantle denominations. They served a purpose at one time – they fostered unity among a congregation and between like-minded congregations, but more than that, they helped to make concrete those aspects of faith that were essential. Formularizing faith has an advantage when people need to understand what their faith is all about – doing so comes at the risk of worshipping the formula rather than the faith. When we get too passionate about KJV versus NASB versus NIV, or about choir versus worship team – then we’ve lost the point of it all.
Again:
What seems to be taking the place of the relative permanence of denominations are the multisite churches. These
- spread the Gospel and they have a focused approach – a unity – that is stable for a while. They can be dispersed across one or more states – even countries.
- are innovative, creative and malleable – something that denominations cannot be.
- are sustaining tremendous growth because they are young, dynamic and driven.
- often have a very charismatic leader at the helm, who provides energy and vision.
Any single multisite church will die off or dissipate after a few decades as the leader slows down, moves on or passes away; its footprint can be picked up by another multisite, or by some completely new form of church that God may already be moving into place.
Another way that God seems to be working today is in combining efforts across congregations. Traditionally, churches that are already established have been at odds with a new church coming to town. They resent the potential loss of congregants, and I’m sorry to say that the minister is usually leading the way in this thought process. But we are called to unity, not jealousy…
So it was refreshing to see this tweet from Geoff Surratt in late Jaunuary –
(@GeoffSurratt is a pastor in a large multistate multisite church called Seacoast based in Charleston, SC; @PerryNoble is the lead pastor of rapidly-growing NewSpring based out of Anderson, SC). This is out of the ordinary – even though it shouldn’t be. We are all in the Body of Christ; we have the same mission in Matt 28; we were all saved by the same Savior.
Different churches reach different people. They’re in different parts of town or the state; they have different leaders who have different skills in reaching out, in speaking, in connecting to others. One church might be blue-collar, another mostly white-collar. One church loves a liturgical service, another a contemporary one.
Could it be – just possibly – that God wants to treat churches as He does people? That he has given them different gifts with the specific intention that those gifts be used to compliment each other?
- A church in a poor part of town provides the opportunity for a (financially) wealthier church to come beside it and receive Grace through sharing finances and also hard work – and thereby to recognize that financial and social privilege is not always the boon that the world makes it out to be (sometimes it can be a terrible impediment).
- A church in India is in a tremendous position to do good for all those around it – it’s at ‘ground zero’, so to speak. It’s poor financially, but what it can buy (food, clothes, buildings) it can obtain locally at a very low cost compared to an American church. A church in the US can’t easily help physically, but it can afford to send money and perhaps a few people to give support and guidance to the fledgling church. The effect on the Indian church could be enormous, and the backwash is pure Grace.
(Interestingly, it’s the multisite church leaders that seem to be setting the pace here – we rarely if ever hear of leaders of denominations traveling overseas to work on ground-setting for church planting. Yet Pete Wilson ( @PeteWilson ), the lead pastor of CrossPoint Church in Nashville, TN is in India as I write this; Perry Noble (@PerryNoble) was in Kenya last year.)
So I see this as part of God’s way forward for us. The missionary part we’ve been doing for a while – but the connection of multiple disparate churches in the same town – that’s so rare it can be thought of as new, and I see that aspect growing in the coming decade.

February 15th, 2010 at 5:31 pm
Some deep, refreshing thoughts there Steve. Sadly, I think too many of us think Philippians 2:1-4 refers only to one’s fellow congregants in the local church. Clearly, we’re called for this life-ministry to extend beyond as you’ve brought to light so well.
Is it the intention of the churches you’ve mentioned to become multisite, at least partly for the reason of not wanting to become a mega-church? I find the concept interesting, where perhaps the splitting of the small group is a microcosm.
I do find the attitude expressed by Geoff Surratt to be refreshing. It is good to see an openness and willingness for churches to work together for the common causes of Christ, though as you said, it really shouldn’t be a radical concept.
.-= Mike Killiany (Mike Roots)´s last blog ..The trouble with lust =-.
February 15th, 2010 at 6:08 pm
Seacoast, NewSpring and Crosspoint have all been multisite for some years now, and they went that way in order to reach other areas of their cities, counties, states to which they felt called. The work they do is tremendous: focused, energetic, missional…and copyable.
However, it takes some heavy skills to build that movement. There needs to be a pastor who is sold out for God; charismatic & identifiable; visioned; determined & energetic; supported by a team of people committed to follow. He needs to be a powerful speaker & motivator, and to either be creative or have some creative people on his team.
I would also note that these churches are all in or very near a sizable city, so they are able to pull in lots of people with lots of talent. I blogged on this phenomenon here: http://steve.gwilt.org/blog/2009/10/02/should-churches-worry-about-talents/